<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: notices 29.7.07</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stpaulsrothesay.wordpress.com/2007/07/30/notices-29707/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stpaulsrothesay.wordpress.com/2007/07/30/notices-29707/</link>
	<description>grace to you and peace</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wonderfulexchange</title>
		<link>http://stpaulsrothesay.wordpress.com/2007/07/30/notices-29707/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>wonderfulexchange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 23:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stpaulsrothesay.wordpress.com/2007/07/30/notices-29707/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>So I wasn't the only one who thought J.K. Rowling revealed her Piskie heritage at last...

It sounds like you had an interesting conversation (not that I would expect anything less).  I'm delighted to hear Richard Dawkin's attempts at evangelism ('malevangelism'?) are back-firing.  Perhaps we should do a study group...

The liturgy thing is sad and worrying, but not suprising.  A recent study in the States suggested that one of the descriptors of worship most likely to be used in a declining church was 'reverent'.   I very much doubt that irreverent churches grow, but the thought of reverence seems to put people off. 

Perhaps it is just as well that at St Paul's we sometimes struggle to live up to the second half of intent that worship be 'seemly and in good order.'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I wasn&#8217;t the only one who thought J.K. Rowling revealed her Piskie heritage at last&#8230;</p>
<p>It sounds like you had an interesting conversation (not that I would expect anything less).  I&#8217;m delighted to hear Richard Dawkin&#8217;s attempts at evangelism (&#8217;malevangelism&#8217;?) are back-firing.  Perhaps we should do a study group&#8230;</p>
<p>The liturgy thing is sad and worrying, but not suprising.  A recent study in the States suggested that one of the descriptors of worship most likely to be used in a declining church was &#8216;reverent&#8217;.   I very much doubt that irreverent churches grow, but the thought of reverence seems to put people off. </p>
<p>Perhaps it is just as well that at St Paul&#8217;s we sometimes struggle to live up to the second half of intent that worship be &#8217;seemly and in good order.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosemary</title>
		<link>http://stpaulsrothesay.wordpress.com/2007/07/30/notices-29707/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>rosemary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stpaulsrothesay.wordpress.com/2007/07/30/notices-29707/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I've been looking for somewhere to say that my otherwise believers came trickling back, with a number of different issues.  Of course the price of really listening is that the conversation goes where others chose to take it, so results are, well, interestingly uneven.  One wanted to talk about funerals - which was interesting.  One wanted to share what made for faith and what for doubt.  Apparently Richard Dawkins irritates so much that he creates faith.  And being part of a church community creates faith - but being accused of blasphemy, unsurprisingly, drives people away.  Sadly (yes, I did suggest the obvious) liturgy is a barrier.  Another  interesting conversation was about the latest Harry Potter with a non-believer.  Apparently it was all going well, till the end (that is, the last half dozen chapters) which seemed rather meaningless.  I did wonder how accessible the last book would be to those outside the tradition.  Interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking for somewhere to say that my otherwise believers came trickling back, with a number of different issues.  Of course the price of really listening is that the conversation goes where others chose to take it, so results are, well, interestingly uneven.  One wanted to talk about funerals - which was interesting.  One wanted to share what made for faith and what for doubt.  Apparently Richard Dawkins irritates so much that he creates faith.  And being part of a church community creates faith - but being accused of blasphemy, unsurprisingly, drives people away.  Sadly (yes, I did suggest the obvious) liturgy is a barrier.  Another  interesting conversation was about the latest Harry Potter with a non-believer.  Apparently it was all going well, till the end (that is, the last half dozen chapters) which seemed rather meaningless.  I did wonder how accessible the last book would be to those outside the tradition.  Interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
